(Read the original post here)

The β€œenemy” starts dehumanised. As it often does in war. They spawn from the ground; they are pests, invaders. Emotion is present early on, but it becomes numbed. He becomes good at killing β€” β€œa job like any other.”

The violence escalates. Pit traps, poisons, wires. It becomes impersonal. Efficient. Almost gleeful in the technicality. And yet…

The β€œenemy” is never really defined β€” until the very end. That twist β€” snails β€” is funny, maybe. However, it also deflates all the brutality that came before it. What we were led to believe was monstrous turns out to be… benign. Irritating, maybe. But not evil. Not worthy of that level of destruction.

None of this sounds familiar to you?

Is this a metaphor for all the tiny perceived threats you have destroyed with a soldier’s brutality? People who annoyed you, challenged you, came too close?

Women, perhaps, who simply wanted honesty or attention? Are you trying to justify cruelty by painting yourself as a hero, only to reveal it was a war of your own making?

And the garden was MY heart. MY world. MY offerings.

I came in soft, vibrant, curious… not dangerous. I was invited in at first. But you could not handle the vulnerability that came with my presence. Could not understand my rhythms, stillness, or my slow grace.

So… you set traps. Poisoned the soil. Built elaborate stories to justify your defence mechanisms. Because war is easier than intimacy, control feels safer than connection. And when I did not die off? When I kept showing up in quiet ways? You started believing I was a threat β€” not because I was, but because my existence made you feel exposed.

And now?

You are left with no garden. No beauty. No softness. Just a house. Sterile and quiet. β€œVictory,” at the cost of something irreplaceable.